|
487). In 1962, she published a series of articles in the New Yorker, resulting in the book Silent Spring--widely credited with launching the modern environmental movement. Over 1 million people die from it each year.To the critics, the solution seems simple: Forget Carson's emotional arguments about dead birds and start spraying DDT again so we can save human lives.Worse than Hitler."What the World Needs Now Is DDT" asserted the headline of a lengthy feature in the New York Times Magazine (4/11/04). And yet, according to many in the media, Carson has more blood on her hands than Hitler.The problems started in the 1940s, when Carson left the Service to begin writing full-time. The book discussed how pesticides and pollutants moved up the food chain, threatening the ecosystems for many animals, especially birds.
From what can be told at this juncture it was all a fabrication. ""Sometimes you find mass murderers in the most unlikely places. "Banning DDT killed more people than Hitler, Ted," explains a character in Michael Crichton's 2004 bestseller, State of Fear (p. Sources she quotes do not exist. thanks to Rachel Carson's junk science classic"--4/21/06), the Hill ("millions die on the altar of politically correct ideologies"--11/02/05), San Francisco Examiner ("Carson was wrong, and millions of people continue to pay the price"--5/28/07) and Wall Street Journal ("environmental controls were more important than the lives of human beings"--2/21/07).Even novelists have gotten in on the game. "[DDT] was so safe you could eat it." That fictional comment not only inspired a column on the same theme in Australia's Sydney Morning Herald (6/18/05), it led Senator James Inhofe (R-Ok).
I got this info from an article on some "fairness in media" website so it is not mine and I'm only drawing on the parts that express the view I wish to express. She was, by all accounts, a mild-mannered writer for the U.S. DDT had been sprayed heavily on houses in developing countries to protect against malaria-carrying mosquitoes. Carson's views [came] at a cost of many thousands of lives worldwide"--5/27/07), New York Sun ("millions of Africans died. Humans, likewise accumulating DDT in our systems, appeared to get cancer as a result. Without them, it warned, we might face the title's silent spring.Farmers used vast quantities of DDT to protect their crops against insects--80 million pounds were sprayed in 1959 alone--but from there it quickly climbed up the food chain. Silent Spring drew attention to these concerns and, in 1972, the resulting movement succeeded in getting DDT banned in the U.S.--a ban that later spread to other nations.And that, according to Carson's critics, is where the trouble started. Bald eagles, eating fish that had concentrated DDT in their tissues, headed toward extinction.
Take Rachel Carson. And again in the Baltimore Sun ("Ms. to invite Crichton and Dr. ("DDT allows [Africans to] climb out of the poverty/subsistence hole in which `caring greens' apparently wish to keep them trapped," it helpfully explains). Mothers passed the chemical on to their children through breast milk.
"No one concerned about the environmental damage of DDT set out to kill African children," reporter Tina Rosenberg generously allowed. A web page on junkscience.com features a live Malaria Death Clock next to a photo of Rachel Carson, holding her responsible for more deaths than malaria has caused in total (you Must tag on other deaths that are caused by the same transmission method: Yellow Fever etc). That given, I will comment upon it at its end. Roberts, a longtime pro-DDT activist, to testify before the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works.But other attacks only seem like fiction. Donald R. And a new website from the Competitive Enterprise Institute, RachelWasWrong.org, features photos of deceased African children along the side of every page.""What is not mentioned in all of this is that much of the data that Carson used to back up her work was of her own making. Papers and publications she sites were never written and their authors are nowhere to be found. The same refrain appears in a Washington Post op-ed by columnist Sebastian Mallaby, gleefully headlined "Look Who's Ignoring Science Now" (10/09/05).
Fish and Wildlife Service--hardly a sociopath breeding ground. No one can find where it was drawn from. Without it, malaria rates in developing countries skyrocketed. Nonetheless, "Silent Spring is now killing African children because of its persistence in the public mind."It's a common theme--echoed by two more articles in the Times by the same author (3/29/06, 10/5/06), and by Times columnists Nicholas Kristof (3/12/05) and John Tierney (6/05/07). Studies that are quoted did not and never have existed. a lie, made up to elevate her own personal insights to dogma.Given the above the only true virtue that can be attributed to "SILENT SPRING" is that it conclusively demonstrates that the shameful inclinations to lie, cheat, exaggerate, miss quote, quote out of context, misalign graphs (a la Al Gore) and out & out prevaricate that have lead to the current Climate-Gate e-mail scandal in the eco-terrorist/Chicken Little movement, have been there since the very beginning and are indelibly etched upon the collective movements soul.
All in all, creating an environment that we thought would be better into something that will take years to recuperate from. The poisons used, like DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane), caused catastrophe within all systems of the environment.
We have the tendency to cut out the things that can be good for our environment but might be ecstatically pleasing to the eye or we don't understand their function within the environment. Since the industrial revolution, we have put more toxins into the our environment and used them to cut out these inconveniencies.
Our environment is affected by everything that we do. Our system has been abused by our need to make things more convenient like less gnats on lake water or less weeds within our lawns or on the roadside.
It was only until 1962 when Rachel Carson wrote Silent Spring that these poisons were even looked into with much scrutiny. This brought the environmental revolution where the people wanted these toxins to be controlled or, more hopefully, eliminated from use.Within Carson's book, the author describes how everything is connected and affected by each other.
This toxin affects and kills everything it comes in contact with, manipulating even the molecular level. We have made our environment into something ugly when it should be good.
I have wanted to read this book forever. I'm glad I finally got a chance to. It is a true eye opener.
This is an iconic book, which every book written about the environment has since been based on. Everyone should read this book at least three times to get a better understanding of the Earth, our environment and what we are doing to it.
I had to order this book for an environmental science class because it is said to have started the environmental movement. All of the rest of the chapters elaborated about the dangers of pesticides and herbicides (which I do agree are dangerous) while citing countless places where they killed unintended plants and animals. The first few chapters were fine. After that it seemed like it was just saying the same thing over and over again. That is the basic idea of the book. you don't need 297 pages to convey that message.
|
